Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Filip Cristian Jianu vs Arthur Reymond Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jianu vs Reymond analysis and find out who is favored!
Filip Cristian Jianu vs Arthur Reymond Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jianu 0 - 0 Reymond
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jianu has won 54.26% of points on his second serve, while Reymond has won 46.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jianu, in recent form, has won 56.57% of his opponent's second serve points, while Reymond has won 52.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.16% and 34.35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jianu has saved 58.4% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Reymond has saved 51.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jianu has won 70.09% of matches played (W/L 75/ 32), with Reymond winning 46.67% (W/L 7/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jianu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 213/ 124), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Reymond has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 85/ 66), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Jianu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.4% of matches (W/L 68/ 21), where as Reymond has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 7/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jianu has played against opponents with an average rank of 191.45 while Reymond has played against players with an average rank of 43.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jianu has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Reymond has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jianu has converted 52.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Reymond has converted 47.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jianu 0 - 0 Reymond
278
Rank
264
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
876
Rank
520
High
25
Age
L
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
60% (256-172)
Career Total W/L
54% (165-139)
78% (42-12)
YTD W/L
43% (3-4)
$5,975
Career Prize Money
$0
4
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Filip Cristian Jianu | Arthur Reymond |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 78% (42/12) | 43% (3/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 73% (88/33) | 50% (8/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 60% (666/435) | 50% (76/75) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 78% (42/12) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 19 |
| DFs per game | 0.07 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 19 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:49 | 1:23:51 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 179.37 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 78% (2715/3502) | 48% (184/383) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (1660/2715) | 70% (128/184) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (439/787) | 47% (93/199) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (268/516) | 47% (17/36) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (1760/3573) | 40% (154/383) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 81% (39/9) | 43% (3/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 78% (42/54) | 43% (3/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (9/13) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 97% (38/37) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 3% (38/1) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (16/5) | 0% (4/0) |
Filip Cristian Jianu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Ioan Alexandru Chirita
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
61%
(
75 of
122)
1st Serve %
72%
(
89 of
123)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
50 of
89)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
47%
(
57 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
58 of
123)
123
Total Points Won
122
|
7-5 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
100%
(
7 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
76%
(
84 of
110)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
107
Total Points Won
99
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Viktor Durasovic
77%
(
75 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
7
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(0) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Noah Perfetti
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve %
79%
(
52 of
66)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Jeiden Saidizand
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
82%
(
47 of
57)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Mika Brunold
78%
(
64 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
63 of
84)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Matej Vocel
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve %
52%
(
17 of
33)
0
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Maximilian Figl
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Arthur Reymond Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Max Alcala Gurri
Player
Arthur Reymond
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
38%
(
18 of
48)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Kokoro Isomura
44%
(
18 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Matthew William Donald
44%
(
31 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gian Marco Ortenzi
Player
Arthur Reymond
80%
(
70 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Arthur Reymond
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
39%
(
24 of
62)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tanguy Genier
Player
Arthur Reymond
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(10) 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Arthur Reymond
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Arthur Reymond
44%
(
39 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
64%
(
32 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
28%
(
25 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
104
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Arthur Reymond
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
76)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jianu Vs Reymond Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
